Changes between Version 3 and Version 4 of SigICMom151215

Show
Ignore:
Timestamp:
12/15/15 17:51:15 (8 years ago)
Author:
darijuss (IP: 193.90.207.170)
Comment:

--

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
Modified
  • SigICMom151215

    v3 v4  
    1010 
    1111=== Minutes of Meeting === 
    12 '''1. Approval of agenda. ''' Approved. [[BR]]  
     12'''1. Approval of agenda. ''' [[BR]] Approved. [[BR]]  
    1313 
    14 '''2. Approval of MoM.''' Approved.[[BR]] 
     14'''2. Approval of MoM.''' [[BR]] Approved.[[BR]] 
    1515 
    16 '''3. DEXPI model for instrumentation ''' 
     16'''3. DEXPI model for instrumentation '''[[BR]]  
    1717Mapping of DEXPI instrumentation classes to SVRDL top hierarchy for instruments. DEXPI needs to have missing instrumentation classes to be included in PCA RDL. See Action 15.07 
    1818[[BR]]  
    19 '''4. Status of DEXPI. ''' 
     19 
     20'''4. Status of DEXPI. '''[[BR]]  
    2021Modelling issues are solved. Implementation questions related to IIMM to be resolved for CAE vendors to start implementing. 
    2122[[BR]]  
    22 '''5. Status of STI. ''' 
     23 
     24'''5. Status of STI. '''[[BR]]  
    2325Administrative items going forward. Budget for the next year is in place. 
    2426[[BR]]  
    25 '''6. Proposal for top classes of instruments. ''' 
     27 
     28'''6. Proposal for top classes of instruments. '''[[BR]]  
    2629To resolve by email what information is available and necessary. 
    2730SC4 has established a small group that will look at Top classes of Part 4. Top classes for instruments should be a part of that discussion. Hans is part of the group and is expected to bring this into the discussion. SC4 workgroup meeting is tomorrow. 
    2831[[BR]]  
    2932 
    30 '''7. Coordination of Reference Data development, maintenance and enhancement ''' 
     33'''7. Coordination of Reference Data development, maintenance and enhancement '''[[BR]]  
    3134Separate Core classes that is and needs to be in Part 4 from standard classes and other. Changes of the core classes need to follow Part 4 process. Update of PCA RDL follows similar to, though, simplified ISO process, but quality assurance needs to be assured.  
     35[[BR]]  
    3236 
     37'''8. Collect and share work done on instruments (JORD, SIG) '''[[BR]]  
     38Plan to share results from STI Pilot2. 
    3339[[BR]]  
    34 '''8. Collect and share work done on instruments (JORD, SIG) ''' 
    35 Plan to share results from STI Pilot2. 
    3640 
    37 [[BR]]  
    3841'''9. Agenda for the next Meeting.''' 
    3942 1. Approval of agenda.  
     
    4952[[BR]] 
    5053  
    51 '''10. A.O.B.''' 
     54'''10. A.O.B.'''[[BR]]  
    5255None. 
    5356[[BR]]  
    54 '''11. Review of Actions ''' 
     57 
     58'''11. Review of Actions '''[[BR]]  
    5559Old actions remain valid. Two new action items are added. 
     60[[BR]]  
    5661 
    5762=== Action items === 
     
    6065'''15.05.''' Hindrik to discuss with Hans edm namespace used in instrumentation top hierarchy. How differet is it from Part 2 and Part 12? edm:FunctionalObject might be miscommunication as Keith was using FunctionalPhysicalObject. 
    6166 
    62 '''New Actions'''  
     67'''New Actions''' [[BR]]  
    6368'''15.06.''' Reference to the approved properties for instruments (request by Chris). [[BR]]  
    64 '''15.07.''' Quality assurance of new reference data items for instrumentation for including them in the PCA RDL. Heiner sends his presentation and spreadsheet to Darijus/Nils. Deadline for resolution: 5th of January, 2016. 
     69'''15.07.''' Quality assurance of new reference data items for instrumentation for including them in the PCA RDL. Heiner sends his presentation and spreadsheet to Darijus/Nils. Deadline for resolution: 5th of January, 2016.[[BR]]  
Home
About PCA
Reference Data Services
Projects
Workgroups